On Following Jesus: Trust (Faith)

(Part 2 of 2)

by Peter L. DeGroote

 

 

Notes for Bible Talk: June 29, 2005

Please read:

Matthew 9: 10-13        Romans 4: 13-21        Genesis 12: 1-9

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bible Talk is an informal discussion of biblical passages, ideas, and related material.

The discussions are on Wednesday evenings at 7:30 pm, following the Service of Word and Table. Occasionally, they will not be held due to special events.

These Notes are intended to assist participants in thinking about the passages and some of their implications prior to the gathering.   

Usually, the Notes are prepared and the discussion is led by Rev. Peter L. DeGroote

 

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

On Following Jesus: Trust (Faith)

 

1.  Last week we asked why a wealthy tax collector would abandon his career and become a follower of Jesus. In our discussion we also took a more comprehensive look at the “call stories.” (A supplemental reading entitled “The Sturdiness of the Gospel Call Stories was handed out and can also be found on the website.)

 

2. This week we turn to a related question: after Matthew decided to follow Jesus, why did Jesus follow Matthew to his home where he attended a party of Matthew's friends, who were thought of as sinners?

 

3. Jesus commonly violated the social norms and religious rules against eating with people labeled unworthy or unclean. His willingness to associate with such people was roundly criticized. Far more important was the implication of Jesus' teachings as they sat around those tables. He spoke of relationships based in the love of God and others in ways that did not require either the traditional religious practices or the official religious leadership. This was heresy, a cause for a trial, and even a death sentence.

 

4. Paul's letter to the several Christian churches in Rome dealt with the continuing arguments over the need to follow traditional Jewish practices, called "the law." Those of Jewish origin insisted that following Jesus included doing so. Those not of Jewish origin, called Greeks, disagreed. 

 

    Paul used theological language to explain the pattern of relationships arising from Jesus' rule of love. His comments are summarized in the phrase, "the righteousness of faith."

 

   Righteousness refers to a relationship with God. Faith refers to trusting God. For Paul, the first step in loving God is trusting God. Out of trust, a relationship develops. For Paul, and many since, that’s righteousness.

 

5. Paul illustrated his point using the story of Abraham’s trust (faith). Abraham’s father, Terah, had led his family (tribe) from Ur, in present day Iraq, to Haron, in present day Syria. After Terah’s death, Abraham heard a call from God to take his own clan to the sparsely populated land of Canaan, later to become Israel.

 

   Their migrations were part of a larger movement of peoples from east to west beginning around 3000 BC. Scholars are not sure of the causes beyond the general description of political, economic, or social upheaval. Related was the need for tribes of nomadic herdsmen to occasionally split into one or more groups to assure enough land to feed their growing herds of cattle. Such divisions commonly occurred on the death of a leader with the result that the patterns of leadership could be easily altered, sons or kinsmen splitting leadership into groups, often called clans. 

 

   The departure of a group from the tribe greatly changed all lives, particularly for those who departed. They would venture into unknown, possibly hostile lands, knowing it unlikely they would see their relatives again, an unsettling situation, to say the least, particularly in a society in which one’s sense of identity was totally tied up with the larger group.

 

   Piecing together the history and the biblical story, we can imagine Abraham deeply troubled, unsure of what to do. Faced with a crisis, he “heard” a promise that was the hope of any clan or tribal leader: “Go to the land I will show you” and you will have land and descendents, and they will become a great nation. It would not be an error to say that Abraham came to understand that if he were to go and do what one who trusted God was supposed to do, all would be well.

 

6. Paul reminded the Romans that that Abraham had received the promise of God “through the righteousness of faith.” In other words, Abraham had trusted what God had “told him,” acted on it, and continued to act on it for the remainder of his life, creating a life-long relationship. The promises of a future were not specific, it was not fortune telling, and there were many ups and downs, but the relationship proved reliable and fulfilling.

 

   7. The fact that Jesus taught that a relationship with God did not require the rules and authority of a traditional religion can be thought of as permission to go our own way; to ignore the religious community. That conclusion overlooks Jesus’ creation of alternative communities of faith among those made unwelcome by traditional religion. Jesus did not teach a private religion. Christianity is a social religion, an important understanding found in both Paul and in the story of Abraham.

 

A. If Paul did not require the traditional practices of Judaism, he did teach a number of rules based on the rule of love. Community harmony is necessary if we are to learn and live the love of God and others. Even so, he understood that the rules merely facilitated community peace. It is to be expected that rules and practices may differ from one community to another; they do not define the faith. Trust in God, demonstrated by the love of God and others, provides that definition.

 

B. The same sense of community is found in Abraham’s story. God’s promise to him was not personal, but for a whole tribe of people and all of their descendents.

 

 

Peter L. DeGroote

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The sources for biblical quotations are labeled as follows:

NRSV: The New Revised Standard Version, Copyright ©1989, The National Council of Churches of Christ in the United States.

SV: The Scholar’s Version; i.e., The Five Gospels, The Search for the Authentic Words of Jesus, Robert W. Funk and Roy W. Hoover, and The Jesus Seminar, Copyright © 1993 by Polebridge Press.

TM: The Message, The New Testament in Contemporary Language, Copyright © Eugene H. Peterson 1993. navpress, Colorado Springs.

M: My paraphrase.