|
Foundry United Rev. Peter DeGroote |
|
|
Exploring Peace Sunday, June 11, 2006 |
|
|
Matthew 5: 9
Rev. Peter DeGroote |
Today
is the first Sunday after Pentecost and you can say that the ball is in our
court. What I mean by that is
Pentecost is the final big celebration of the Christian year. The Christian
year starts with Advent, and then we go to Christmas and the seasons of
Christmas, and then we go to Epiphany.
Then we go to Lent, and then we have Easter, and finally we come to
Pentecost. At Pentecost, we proclaim
that the Holy Spirit is in the church.
We proclaim that God is present with us, as we are here. God is
present with us in
our community. So, the
ball is in our court. The question is:
what do we do about it? If we are to proclaim
God is with us, what do we do about it?
I began to answer that question by noting that the Now,
over the last couple of decades there have been all sorts of attempts to
translate these beatitudes into different words, particularly that first
word, “blessed,” in ways that I have never been comfortable with. The one that bothers me the most is the
word “happy,” which one finds in some of the common language translations. The beatitudes,
or the blessings, come from a long biblical tradition that stretches way back
into the beginning of our traditions and, to make it brief, the heart of the
beatitudes rests in the theology of covenant.
All covenants are efforts to define the meaning of two concepts: first,
righteousness and, second, justice. Righteousness
means a right relationship with God, a harmonious relationship with God, loving
God. A harmonious relationship with
God results in justice, for we share God’s concerns and God’s interests,
because we are interested in living in harmony with others. We are interested
in loving God and loving others. In
brief, we are truly interested in the welfare, the well-being, and the wholeness
of all other people – that’s justice.
When we are concerned with justice, we are concerned with the nature
of our community, we are concerned with how it is structured and we are
concerned that there are people who are hungry and shouldn’t be. When we are concerned with justice, we
acknowledge that all folks have a right to their full participation in
society and to the necessities of life.
Righteousness
and justice are at the heart of all covenants. It goes well beyond the stuff of lawyers
and courts. The operative word in
covenant is “shalom,” or peace. If the covenant is kept, the community knows
peace. The greeting “shalom” means,
“may God’s peace be with you.” In this context, then, when we say “blessed
are the peacemakers,” we are saying “God is with the peacemakers.” The
peacemaker is the one who maintains righteousness. God is with the peacemaker.
The peacemaker is the one who maintains harmony with God’s children. The peacemaker is one who keeps the
covenant. Blessed is the peacemaker. God is with the peacemaker. The peacemaker is a child of God. A child
of God is the one who has kept the covenant. In that tradition, that is the
understanding of these beatitudes. Now, to
be a peacemaker in this day and age is difficult, almost inconceivable how we
can do it. But I have been looking for
a model to help us begin to think about this.
And I say begin to think. The title I used was “Exploring Peace.” All
I’m doing is exploring, perhaps struggling But one
of things that I have noticed is the extreme similarity, the immense
parallels between what is in The
similarities between Palestine of Jesus’ day and the Quite
frankly, in the many discussions we have about it, we all go in many very
different ways. But I find myself having to put myself into a position of
making sure the fundamentals, making sure the foundations upon which I am
thinking and acting are in place. In this
exploration, I suggest to you three things: a principle, a practice and a way.
These are three things that may help us keep some of the fundamentals with us
as we proceed. First
of all, a principle. It’s worth keeping in mind the phrase “peace with
justice” is an extremely ambiguous term, because it raises the question: whose
justice? In Our
political leadership enjoys using the quote attributed to Jesus: “If you’re
not with us, you’re against us.” But there is another quote attributed to
Jesus: “If you’re not against us, you’re with us.” Now when you meditate on
those two things, you realize that they go in opposite directions. Now,
unless Jesus was mildly schizophrenic, we’re going to have to make a choice
between which one Jesus said. It’s not very hard to realize that if you’re
not against me, you’re with me is much more in harmony with all the other
teachings of Jesus than the other. It makes room for discussion. It makes
room for diversity. It makes room for exploration. It makes room for a sense
of freedom with other people. It releases us from the stiffness of certain
forms and structures that we so often feel that we get ourselves into. I want
to illustrate this principle and the best way I could think of to do it is to
ask you to sing a hymn. If we can look at number 437, “This is My Song.” I
have always thought that this is one of the best hymns of peace that I have
ever sung. But we’re only going to sing the first two verses, the verses that
Lloyd Stone wrote. This is my home,
the country where my heart is; here are my hopes,
my dreams, my holy shrine; but other hearts
in other lands are beating with hopes and dreams as true and
high as mine. In the
1930’s, Georgia Harkness, a woman whose memory I greatly honor, a woman who
accomplished a great deal in the face of great opposition, felt a need to
write the third verse to this hymn, felt a need to make sure that it is a
Christian hymn, to give a slant to it that many Christians agreed with and
still do. Here, Georgia Harkness wrote: This is my prayer,
O Lord of all earth’s kingdoms: Thy kingdom come;
on earth thy will be done. Let Christ be
lifted up till all shall serve him, and hearts united learn to live as
one. Her
solution to peace was to evangelize the whole world for Christ. Now we know
that that’s not going to happen, and even if it did, it would get a little
dangerous because, you know, when you get a lot of Christians together, all
they do is start fighting. So, the
point I am trying to make is that this peace with justice needs to be
tempered a bit with the principle that we are not always right, that we need
to listen to other people’s sense of justice, that we need to understand,
that we need to know that our way of life is not necessarily the most
civilized and superior way of life despite all of its uniqueness, all of its
blessings, all of its wealth. We need to cool our heels a little bit. We need
to figure out why there are people who hate us. That seems to me an important
principle if we are going to proceed with understanding how our faith works
in making peace. It is something we must do to become peacemakers. Second
is the practice. It seems to me that we need to practice to take Jesus’
teachings about war seriously. Now, early on in human history, there
developed the rule “an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.” It was an
attempt to quell the warfare between tribes and families. It was circular. I
always think about this group down in Now we
have to begin to deal with this. The earliest of Christians did not support
the notion of warfare. You couldn’t be a soldier and be a Christian, early
on. That changed by the third century. Since the third century, this teaching
of Jesus has been largely ignored by most Christians and by the church in
general. We don’t know what to do with it. Our answer to it is the theory of
the just war. If you read the theory of the just war, you realize after it’s
all over, and you have finished reading it all, it’s just a very
sophisticated version of “an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.” I
recently came across an interesting comment in reading James J. O’Donnell’s
new biography of Augustine. James J. O’Donnell is a professor at I don’t
know the answer to these things. My title is “Exploring Peace.” But I do know
that we’ve got to deal with these things and we cannot ignore the teachings
of Jesus if we are to say that we are followers of Jesus with any sense of
integrity. We can’t ignore it. We must figure out how it works out, in our
lives, in our thinking, in our politics and everything else about us. Last, I
suggest a way, a way of life that takes seriously the planting of seeds. You
can describe Jesus’ life in all sorts of ways, but one of the more popular
ways was to say that Jesus was planting seeds. He went through life showing
people how to do things. He went through life setting examples. One of
his parables is the parable of the mustard seed in which the mustard seed is
planted and it grows into a very large bush, some say a tree, in which the
birds of the air can find protection, safety, security in hard times, in
difficult times. But, yet, they can fly out into the world from that safety
and security and they take with them some of the seeds of that mustard bush
so that the mustard bush spreads. One of the characteristics of the mustard
bush in the That’s
what Jesus said. He said that the We need
to find ways to make our church a place of safety and security. We need to
find ways to make our lives places of safety and security. We need to find
ways to make our friendships and our homes places of safety and security, so
that when anybody comes into contact with us, not only do they feel safe and
secure, but they have seeds to take somewhere else. Now,
we’re moving into our time of prayer, and I would like to make a transition
between my sermon and this time of prayer by singing one other hymn, number 431
– “Let There Be Peace on Earth.” www.foundryumc.org |
|
|
|
|
|
|