|
Foundry United Rev. DeeAnne Lowman, Associate Pastor |
|
|
Courageous Past, Bold Future Sunday, December 3,
2006 |
|
|
Isaiah 42: 5-9
|
As a teenager, I stood in the pulpit of Wesley
Chapel in At the time, I didn’t know much about the history
of clergywomen in the Methodist tradition in the "First of all, if I voted yes, I would be able to
say to my District Superintendent, 'Yes, send me a woman pastor.' "Secondly, the ministers as well as the laymen
would have to say, 'I am willing to serve under a woman district
superintendent,' for if this goes through, we are not going to discriminate. "I do not like even to use the word 'discrimination'
because in my mind it has always been connected with unhappiness and
discontent. I have never felt that I needed as a woman to fight for equal
rights with men. I feel I have far more rights than the men will ever have. "Furthermore, Bishop, my last question that I
believe the delegates of this Conference would have to answer in the
affirmative if they vote yes, would be this: We are willing to elect a woman
bishop. Now, you may think that is rather exaggerated, but, believe me, it is
not. You have had reference to the power of womanhood. I leave that to your
own thinking. "I would urge that this be considered very
seriously, that no more joking about it be passed around, and that you vote
no when it comes to the majority report and that you support the minority
report for the sake of the women of our Church." Dr.
Georgia Harkness was one of the women who worked for the change. She grew up in upstate “Some 50 years ago, there goes a story, a friend went to
a village on a hunting expedition. There by the side of a river stood a
master boatman. He asked, 'Do the crocodiles in the river cause any harm to
human life?’ “The master boatman smiled and casually replied, ‘No
harm to human life. They occasionally carry away goats and women.’ “I have not yet stated my case. This is just an
introduction. “Mr. Chairman, I can trace this splendid sentiment of
masculine men back to “I was wondering whether such is the sentiment that you
express here. “I should support full clergy rights for women.” Eventually,
after extensive debating the It
seems fitting as we begin our trek into this season of Advent that we
acknowledge another time and place when God called and a woman
responded. In this morning’s Gospel
lesson, we heard the tale of a young woman, called by God in a pretty
unmistakable way. At least the
scriptures would have us believe that her call was clear. At the risk of eliciting a charge of
heresy, I wonder aloud just how many women Gabriel visited in that “sixth
month”. Were there others, or did this
angel know how to pick ‘em? I have
always lived with the assurance that God has a backup plan for the times that
I say no. Maybe there were others who were asked and declined the invitation. But Mary didn’t say no. She said yes. It may have been courageous or crazy, but
she agreed to let this happen to her. She agreed, unknowingly, I suspect, to
this convoluted story of angels and shepherds and heavenly hosts and
unwelcoming innkeepers and dirty stables and arduous and difficult travel. These
decisions on the part of both God and Mary were problematic for most of
society. Certainly this scenario wasn’t part of Joseph’s plan, and we hear
nothing about Mary’s immediate family and their life experiences around the
events that we celebrate. My guess is that
there wasn’t much celebrating at the time. Along the way, God provided
glimpses of hope to Mary and Joseph – glimpses of a future that would turn
the world upside down and begin to lift up the lowly and bring down the
powerful from their thrones. I don’t
think I’m too bold in saying that those in the fight against full clergy
rights for women had their bodies securely fastened to seats of power and
authority in the church. I find it
fascinating that the biggest concern about full rights for clergywomen wasn’t
about their ability to preach or even lead a church. It had to do with power, and the
possibility that women clergy might – MIGHT – be elected to General
Conference or even to the position of bishop within the church. The
progress that we have made as a denomination regarding the full acceptance of
women within the leadership of the denomination has been slow. The first woman bishop, as Mrs. Ebner had
feared, was elected in 1980, almost a ¼ of a century after the change to the
discipline – Marjorie Matthews, a 4’11” grandmother. The Episcopal stole that
was hung around her neck at her consecration as bishop was designed for a
six-foot man; it hung down her robe and continued along the floor. I can relate. She, like Mary, was an unlikely choice for
such a high and important position.
But Marjorie, like Mary, lived her call and chosen well, bringing
forth the Word to the people of God. Some
across our denomination are still opposed if not in word than in deed to
clergywomen serving. During my first
interview for a full-time appointment in the church, one of the men at the
table asked if I was still called pastor, or should it be “pastorette?” I couldn’t bring myself to even fake a
laugh; instead I just smiled and told him that he could simply call me
Dee. For me, it wasn’t even a thought
that I couldn’t be ordained and wouldn’t be allowed and even encouraged to
serve. That appointment reminded me just how far we as a denomination have to
go. This was in 1995. Within
our denomination there are still those who advocate exclusion when it comes
to gay, lesbian, bisexual and trans-gendered persons in the full life and
ministry of the church. Of
particularly concern to many is the deliberate restriction of ordination of
GLBT persons who choose to live out their God-gifted sexuality in committed,
monogamous relationships while desiring to serve God and God’s people. The
vision that Mary had of an angel choosing her – of God choosing her to serve
such an important role in the history of the world is one we can ponder
without a great deal of trouble. She
was however, as unlikely a choice as any.
She was young, engaged to be married, and a virgin. And yet, Jesus would be born to her. She would bring forth a child who could
change to world. How many parents of
children have had no greater hope for their children then this: that they could change the world? How many children baptized in the United
Methodist Church were brought up to believe that, as the prophet Isaiah
heard, they were to be “a light to the nations,” but are now told that it
isn’t appropriate for their light to shine simply because of who they
love? Yes, my
friends. Women were just the start of
it, and I am proud to be in the line of Mary, Marjorie, and Maud Jenson, the
first women to be ordained in 1956.
Perhaps, like Mary, we will see the world differently when we see the
new things that God will declare. May
our children’s children look back at our debate during this time in history
and be just as amused by the voices and transcripts from our time as we are
by Mrs. Henry Ebner’s comments of 50 years ago. This can be our bold future. Mary,
the first woman to bring the Word to the world; may God continue to bless us
through this story of hope during this Advent season and beyond. www.foundryumc.org |
|
|
|
|
|
|