|
Foundry United Rosanne Haggerty, Guest Preacher |
|
|
“When One Suffers,
All Suffer” Sunday, April 27, 2008 |
|
|
1 Corinthians 12: 12-26
Rosanne Haggerty |
Today’s
reading is a familiar one. Paul offers
the body as a vivid way to illustrate the depth of our interdependence. On
some level, I imagine most of us believe that. We know what it is to feel the hurts of our
children, our parents, or others close to us as if they were our own. We feel
deep concern and empathy for those we know or merely hear about who are
suffering. In recent years, though, I’ve come to suspect that there’s more
going on in this reading, and that it is profoundly unsettling. What if we are being told that we are not
simply to feel sympathy, and act mercifully, as though we could choose to or
not. What if this reading is not
trying to encourage us to care for each other, but is actually revealing something to us, and that
our lives depend on our hearing it? What if it is telling us that our health –
the functioning of each of our bodies, families, institutions and
neighborhoods – is connected to, is dependent on, the health and functioning
of all, and that working for the health of others is not an option, but necessary and essential for our own
health and survival? In
recent years, this reading, and its meaning, has become a kind of stake in
the ground for me and my organization, Common Ground, in our work to end
homelessness. It has pushed us beyond merely providing homes for homeless
people: it has gradually restored our sense of urgency about homelessness,
and has caused us to question, and ultimately to change, our whole response
to those living on the street. It
moved us from being an organization that helped homeless people to one that
works to end homelessness. I am
honored to be here at Foundry to talk about ending homelessness, and about
the work you’re doing and the work we’re doing at Common Ground. About
18 years ago, I stopped in to see the old Times Square Hotel on So,
when an old hotel in Common
Ground thus began, and our first project, the Times Square Hotel, produced
652 studio apartments. We had a mix of tenants: lower income working people
had an opportunity to live there as well as formerly homeless
individuals. It turned out to be a
terrific win-win for the community and the homeless. For a fraction of the cost of operating a
24 hour shelter, Common Ground could offer individuals their own home. And
the neighboring businesses and property owners were thrilled to have a well
run apartment building in a restored landmark building instead of a
disruptive eyesore. By having the
support services tenants needed, such as health and mental health care,
budgeting and job links right in the building, tenants could get back on
their feet and leave homelessness behind.
In addition to making sense morally, we demonstrated that providing
housing and support in rebuilding lives makes economic sense. Supportive housing costs a fraction of what
is spent on hospitals, shelters and jails-the places that homeless people
rely on in the absence of housing. The Yet for
all the project’s success, the numbers of homeless in For a
time, we debated whether that was our problem. After all, we were doing our
part, we’d say. But it
was impossible to escape the fact we were not even impacting what was
happening on streets right around us in Ultimately,
we concluded we needed to radically change our practices. Historically,
we had taken applications from shelters, from people about to lose their
housing, from those in great need. But
because we had so many applications for our housing we had prioritized those
who were the most motivated: those who got their paper work in first,
followed up on appointments for interviews, were working hardest to stay off
drugs or alcohol or getting treatment for their mental illness or health
problems. Practically, that seemed to make sense but it was not achieving the
greater goal of ending homelessness. We
decided to do the opposite: to directly seek out and house that small
percentage of the homeless, about 15%, who remained in shelters for years,
not days. Research
had revealed differential patterns of shelter use. Most people who experience homelessness do
so for a brief period. Yet others became trapped in homelessness, and are
unable to escape the situation on their own. They enter a state of chronic
homelessness – and account for the vast predominance of shelter use and
visible street homelessness. They also tend to suffer from a combination of
mental health, drug addiction and medical problems – and thus are the most
costly to municipal, state and federal governments. We
started going into shelters looking specifically for these individuals. And we also began looking for those who had
been on the street the longest, doing our best to persuade them to let us
help them find housing As we
did this, we shifted our focus to those who were trapped in homelessness the
longest and who had lived years on the streets, their suffering visible to us
all. They also often had been the most resistant and unattractive. As we did
this, something profound began to happen: homelessness began to decline. In the 20 blocks around our Times Square
building, the most concentrated area of street homelessness in It’s
not magic at work, it’s a strategy. We are
now showing communities how they can end homelessness, not merely help
homeless people. We have moved beyond our work in In
closing, let me return to Paul’s challenge and reflect that in working with
those who seem the most difficult, most ill, most needy- with the least
desirable parts of our communal body – and in succeeding in helping them to
transform their lives, my colleagues and I – our whole organization – has been
transformed. We have had our own health restored. Thank
you for the work you do for the homeless. We are delighted to now be working
with you to end homelessness. Thank
you. www.foundryumc.org |
|
|
|
|
|
|